UK GVT DB Pension Superfunds


On Dec. 7, UK GVT proposed consolidating DB pension superfunds.


  • Consultation seeks view on new legislative framework for authorizing, regulating consolidation of defined pension schemes into a superfund for improved funding.
  • Follows DWP Mar. 2018 white paper protecting defined benefit pension schemes.
  • Advantages
  • Security through capital buffer reduce any risk from future employer insolvencies.
  • Alternative allowing employers to move closed pension schemes into a superfund.
  • Improved chances of full benefits being paid allows wider innovative investments.
  • Proposals
  • Superfunds required to seek authorization from TPR, otherwise unable to operate.
  • To cover the TPR authorisation cost, proposal includes introducing application fee.
  • Paper also sets out proposed criteria for TPR to grant authorization to a superfund.
  • Effectiveness
  • Consultation period begins on Dec. 7, 2018 and runs until Feb. 1, 2019.
  • TPR Expectations
  • On Dec. 7, 2018, TPR issued guidance setting out expectations of DB superfunds.
  • TPR intend for expectations to operate before authorization regime is put in place.
  • And whilst authorisation framework planned by government is under consultation.
  • Reflect the consultation proposals regarding criteria proposed for an authorization.
  • In addition, TPR issued guide for trustees considering transferring to a superfund.
  • Feb. 2019 PRA Response
  • On Feb. 5, 2019, UK PRA issued response to UK GVT consultation on DB pensions.
  • Agree regulatory regime is needed for defined benefit pension (DB) consolidators.
  • The pension promises which are made by DB schemes are very similar to annuity products, and profit-seeking DB consolidators are similar to insurance companies.
  • Regulation will help to solve tension between the members’ security and investors.
  • Regulation of consolidator will need to include robust framework for authorization.
  • Important that regime to support vital long-term services is well thought-through.
  • PRA response considers further analysis that could help develop regulatory regime.
  • Focuses on five key areas: financial sustainability, future transfer of DB schemes from consolidators to insurers, authorization, supervision, reporting / disclosure.
  • Risks faced by DB consolidators are similar to those managed by insurance firms providing annuities, insurance firms may want to enter DB consolidation market.
  • May be unintended consequences if 2 types of business are regulated differently.
  • Framework could require consolidators to calculate prudential requirements using same methods as insurers / have found the insurance framework to be effective.
  • It is very challenging to minimize the risk of arbitrage between regulatory regimes.
  • CP includes option that consolidators act as a bridge, until schemes strong enough to buy annuities and think this would be the most effective in mitigating arbitrage.
  • Note and support the development of a robust authorization / supervision regime.
  • Would argue that insurance framework provides appropriate model for protection.
  • And would encourage further analysis of how to meet the desired policy objectives.
  • On Jun. 18, 2020, UK TPR launched superfund pension interim regime, see #79985.
  • Jul. 2023 UK GVT Response
  • On Jul. 11, 2023, UK GVT issued its response to DB scheme consolidation consultation.
  • Follows UK Chancellor Hunt Jul. 2023 launched new set of reforms, see #178782.
  • Vast majority of responses were supportive of proposals, and keen to see superfunds up, running and regulated in UK, setting up system will ensure they operate securely.
  • UK GVT commits to having permanent, regulated regime for superfunds as soon as parliamentary time allows, expects significant investment as superfunds develop.
  • Sets out schemes in scope of superfunds, trying to reach schemes that cannot yet access full insurance buyout, but are also suitably funded prior to the capital injection.
  • As well as funding level, other factors include size of scheme and employer covenant.
  • UK GVT will not mandate that a superfund is either sectionalized or co-mingled.
  • Superfunds will be authorized and supervised by UK TPR, which currently oversees interim regime, UK GVT will use any lessons from this to build the permanent regime.
  • Systems/processes to be put in place for governance, including risk level, intervention triggers, profit trigger, wind-up trigger, with proposed ladders of intervention.
  • Financial sustainability and capital adequacy will be most critical part of framework.
  • UK GVT intends that the primary legislation will provide for a new compulsory framework applicable to superfunds and other relevant models of consolidation.
  • Secondary legislation will set out further details, this will enable greater flexibility to respond to the changing market and enable more detailed consultation with industry.
  • In Sep. 2023, UKP issued letter to UK PRA on role of consolidators, see #184824.

Regulators UK GVT; UK PRA; UK TPR
Entity Types Corp; IA; Inv Co; Pension
Reference Rsp, PR, 7/11/2023; PR, Rsp, 2/5/2019; PR, CP, Gd, 12/7/2018; PN18-64
Functions Compliance; C-Suite; Exams; Financial; Legal; Reporting; Treasury
Countries United Kingdom
Category Central Government; National Regulator
State
Products Corporate; Fund Mgt; Pensions; Retirement Plan
Regions EMEA
Rule Type Proposed
Rule Date 12/7/2018
Effective Date 7/11/2023
Rule Id 50351
Linked to Rule :178782
Reg. Last Update 7/11/2023
Report Section UK

Last substantive update on 07/12/2023